Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention versus balloon angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparison of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry and the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND This investigation compares the results of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with standard balloon angioplasty among patients with multivessel coronary disease. Patients having balloon angioplasty in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) and those within the Dynamic Registry meeting BARI eligibility criteria were studied. METHODS AND RESULTS Clinical features and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of 857 BARI-eligible patients in the Dynamic Registry (contemporary PCI) were compared with the 904 randomized patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in BARI. Compared with BARI patients, Registry patients had fewer lesions attempted (1.53 versus 2.56, P=0.001), more frequent single-vessel PCI (76% versus 33%, P<0.001), greater use of intracoronary stents (76% versus 1%, P<0.001), and GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist (24% versus 0%, P<0.001). Angiographic success was achieved more often among Registry patients (91% versus 72%, P<0.001), whereas abrupt closure (1.5% versus 9.5%, P<0.001) and in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (1.9% versus 10.2%, P<0.001) and myocardial infarction (0.8% versus 2.1%, P=0.025) were less common. No differences were observed in either in-hospital or 1-year death, but 1-year death/myocardial infarction was lower in the Registry. Registry patients had lower 1-year rates of subsequent CABG (8.6% versus 22.7%, P<0.001) and PCI (12.4% versus 22.5%, P<0.001). By multivariate analysis, contemporary PCI was independently associated with reduced risk for in-hospital CABG, 1-year CABG, and 1-year PCI. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with multivessel disease, contemporary PCI resulted in safer and more durable revascularization. These results support the role of PCI for selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
منابع مشابه
Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Background—This investigation compares the results of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with standard balloon angioplasty among patients with multivessel coronary disease. Patients having balloon angioplasty in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) and those within the Dynamic Registry meeting BARI eligibility criteria were studied. Methods and Result...
متن کاملInfluence of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Diabetic Clinical Alert on Practice Patterns Results from the National Cardiovascular Network Database
Background—In 1995, the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) found that patients with diabetes had a survival benefit when treated with surgical revascularization versus balloon angioplasty, prompting a National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) “Clinical Alert.” The influence of the BARI findings and of the Clinical Alert on practice patterns is unknown. Methods and R...
متن کاملA decade of improvement in the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease.
Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease To the Editor: We appreciate the editorial by Drs Popma, Kuntz, and Baim1 highlighting the recently published comparison of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry and the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) study.2 In particular, it is gratifying to have them reco...
متن کاملCoronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with diabetes: another nail in the coffin or "too close to call?".
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was introduced by Gruentzig as an alternative to bypass surgery and was originally applied for symptomatic patients with singlevessel disease. As technology advanced, angioplasty became a therapy for the more usual forms of multivessel disease. Randomized trials have justified the use of angioplasty in selected patients with multivessel disease with one ...
متن کاملImportance of considering atherosclerosis progression when choosing a coronary revascularization strategy: the diabetes-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty dilemma.
The choice of which coronary revascularization strategy is best for diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease has always been complex. The presence of diabetes, especially insulin-requiring diabetes, has been associated with higher rates of acute and late-term adverse events for both PTCA1 and bypass surgery,2 making either approach seemingly suboptimal. The results of the Bypass Angi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Circulation
دوره 106 13 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002